Birmingham vs Lusaka
Home Price & Cost of Living Comparison
Live DataLast updated: March 31, 2026·Source: OECD, Numbeo & National Statistics
💡 Why it matters: Birmingham vs Lusaka
Lusaka is 78% more affordable for homebuyers. Birmingham has a price-to-income ratio of 5.8x compared to 6.2x in Lusaka.
| Metric | Birmingham | Lusaka |
|---|---|---|
| Avg Home Price | $250,000 | $55,000 |
| Price / sqm | $3,200 | $700 |
| Rent (1BR) | $900/mo | $250/mo |
| Rent (3BR) | $1,400/mo | $450/mo |
| Price-to-Income | 5.8x | 6.2x |
| Mortgage Rate | 4.5% | 22.0% |
| 1yr Change | +4.2% | +5.8% |
| Median Income | $43,000/yr | $9,000/yr |
| Population | 1,100,000 | 3,100,000 |
📊
HomePricePeek Research TeamData Specialists
Our team analyzes data from OECD, Numbeo & National Statistics to deliver accurate, up-to-date information. All data is verified and cross-referenced with official sources.
✓ OECD, Numbeo & National Statistics✓ Updated 2025
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Birmingham or Lusaka more expensive?
Lusaka is more affordable. Home prices differ by $195,000 (78%).
Which city has cheaper rent, Birmingham or Lusaka?
Rent for a 1BR in Birmingham is $900/mo vs $250/mo in Lusaka.
Explore the DataPeek Network