Chicago vs Indianapolis
Home Price & Cost of Living Comparison
Live DataLast updated: March 31, 2026·Source: OECD, Numbeo & National Statistics
💡 Why it matters: Chicago vs Indianapolis
Indianapolis is 28% more affordable for homebuyers. Chicago has a price-to-income ratio of 4.8x compared to 3.5x in Indianapolis.
| Metric | Chicago | Indianapolis |
|---|---|---|
| Avg Home Price | $320,000 | $230,000 |
| Price / sqm | $4,200 | $2,200 |
| Rent (1BR) | $1,800/mo | $1,000/mo |
| Rent (3BR) | $2,800/mo | $1,500/mo |
| Price-to-Income | 4.8x | 3.5x |
| Mortgage Rate | 6.8% | 6.8% |
| 1yr Change | +3.2% | +4.5% |
| Median Income | $67,000/yr | $66,000/yr |
| Population | 2,700,000 | 880,000 |
📊
HomePricePeek Research TeamData Specialists
Our team analyzes data from OECD, Numbeo & National Statistics to deliver accurate, up-to-date information. All data is verified and cross-referenced with official sources.
✓ OECD, Numbeo & National Statistics✓ Updated 2025
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Chicago or Indianapolis more expensive?
Indianapolis is more affordable. Home prices differ by $90,000 (28%).
Which city has cheaper rent, Chicago or Indianapolis?
Rent for a 1BR in Chicago is $1,800/mo vs $1,000/mo in Indianapolis.
Explore the DataPeek Network