Chicago vs Lusaka
Home Price & Cost of Living Comparison
Live DataLast updated: March 31, 2026·Source: OECD, Numbeo & National Statistics
💡 Why it matters: Chicago vs Lusaka
Lusaka is 83% more affordable for homebuyers. Chicago has a price-to-income ratio of 4.8x compared to 6.2x in Lusaka.
| Metric | Chicago | Lusaka |
|---|---|---|
| Avg Home Price | $320,000 | $55,000 |
| Price / sqm | $4,200 | $700 |
| Rent (1BR) | $1,800/mo | $250/mo |
| Rent (3BR) | $2,800/mo | $450/mo |
| Price-to-Income | 4.8x | 6.2x |
| Mortgage Rate | 6.8% | 22.0% |
| 1yr Change | +3.2% | +5.8% |
| Median Income | $67,000/yr | $9,000/yr |
| Population | 2,700,000 | 3,100,000 |
📊
HomePricePeek Research TeamData Specialists
Our team analyzes data from OECD, Numbeo & National Statistics to deliver accurate, up-to-date information. All data is verified and cross-referenced with official sources.
✓ OECD, Numbeo & National Statistics✓ Updated 2025
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Chicago or Lusaka more expensive?
Lusaka is more affordable. Home prices differ by $265,000 (83%).
Which city has cheaper rent, Chicago or Lusaka?
Rent for a 1BR in Chicago is $1,800/mo vs $250/mo in Lusaka.
Explore the DataPeek Network