Chicago vs Muscat
Home Price & Cost of Living Comparison
Live DataLast updated: March 31, 2026·Source: OECD, Numbeo & National Statistics
💡 Why it matters: Chicago vs Muscat
Muscat is 13% more affordable for homebuyers. Chicago has a price-to-income ratio of 4.8x compared to 5.5x in Muscat.
| Metric | Chicago | Muscat |
|---|---|---|
| Avg Home Price | $320,000 | $280,000 |
| Price / sqm | $4,200 | $3,200 |
| Rent (1BR) | $1,800/mo | $900/mo |
| Rent (3BR) | $2,800/mo | $1,600/mo |
| Price-to-Income | 4.8x | 5.5x |
| Mortgage Rate | 6.8% | 5.5% |
| 1yr Change | +3.2% | +2.2% |
| Median Income | $67,000/yr | $51,000/yr |
| Population | 2,700,000 | 1,400,000 |
📊
HomePricePeek Research TeamData Specialists
Our team analyzes data from OECD, Numbeo & National Statistics to deliver accurate, up-to-date information. All data is verified and cross-referenced with official sources.
✓ OECD, Numbeo & National Statistics✓ Updated 2025
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Chicago or Muscat more expensive?
Muscat is more affordable. Home prices differ by $40,000 (13%).
Which city has cheaper rent, Chicago or Muscat?
Rent for a 1BR in Chicago is $1,800/mo vs $900/mo in Muscat.
Explore the DataPeek Network